Introduction to the amphibian order Anura (or Salientia), frogs and
toads.
The
order anura includes frogs and toads. Technically, toads are a
special type of frog that possess extraordinary granulous skin that
allows them to inhabit drier areas, and shorter hind limbs for
"walking" instead of leaping. The term "anura" roughly translates
to
"without a tail", and refers to the lack of tails in adult
frogs. The term "salientia" is a basal term that is
applied to amphibians that are more closely related to the order
anura, than to the orders caudata or gymnophiona (Ford &
Cannatella, 1993). Frogs are perhaps the most recognizable amphibian species, with
their long hind legs and ability to leap, and their great
vocalization abilities. There are exceptions to the
"typical" frog, as some have developed adaptations for
fossorial, aquatic, and arboreal lifestyles. Some may be
magnificently colored in bright reds, oranges, blues, pinks, and
just about every other color, while others may be subtle browns or
greens. Many species can change their colors to better blend into
their environment, or by chemical cues.
What truly defines a frog are the morphological features present
in all, including a maximum of 9 vertebrae in the front sacrum, such
that the posterior three or four vertebrae are fused into a urostyle
(Duellman & Trueb, 1986). Furthermore, frogs do not possess
tails into adulthood, and possess a radioulna, which is a fused
radius and ulna, and a fused tibiofibula, which is a fused tibia and
fibula (Larson, 2004). The hind legs of most species are far
longer than the front legs, by means of elongated tibiale and
fibulare, an adaptation for leaping (Duellman & Trueb, 1986).
This, of course, is a reduced characteristic in those species that
have adapted to lifestyles that do not require great leaping, such
as the fossorial species.
Synapomorphies that deifine all taxa in Salientia include 14
presacral vertebrae, elongate and anteriorly directed ilium, the
presence of a frotoparietal, and a the lack of tail and teeth
(Milner, 1988).
Another important distinction among the frog order is the tadpole
stage. The majority of frogs are biphasic, hatching from eggs, and
experiencing an aquatic larval stage prior to metamorphosis. In
frogs, the aquatic larval stage, or tadpole stage, is very distinct
in that tadpoles always fully metamorphose. Contrast this to the
caudates, where neoteny or paedomorphism is observed in nine of the
ten families, with four families comprised fully of species that
retain larval characteristics into adulthood. In addition, anuran
larvae always absorb their tails during metamorphosis, whereas the
tail is retained in caudates. Tadpoles are highly specialized,
compared to caudate and caecilian larvae, and are equipped to
consume as much food as possible during this stage. The more food
consumed, the faster the tadpole will grow and metamorphose.
The earliest known anuran is the fossil Triadobatrachus
massinoti from Madagascar, which existed during the Early
Triassic, approximately 250 million years ago (Larson, 2004). This
fossil species had not yet evolved all of the features that define
the modern frogs, but was a stepping stone of the living amphibians
today. The earliest true frog is Vieraella herbsti, from the
the Early Jurassic, about 188-213 million years ago (Larson, 2004).
Modern frogs existed prior to the major groups of dinosaurs.
There are more than 4,500 recognized anuran
species, making the order anura the largest of the three.
Frogs also have the widest distribution, which includes just about
every habitat imaginable, with high concentrations in the tropics.
The distribution map at right shows the approximate global range of
anurans. The largest of the thirty anuran families is
Leptodactylidae,
comprised of over 1,100 species, followed by Hylidae at more than
800 species, and Ranidae at more than 700 species. Allophrynidae,
Nasikobatrachidae, and Rhinophrynidae are the smallest families, all
comprised of only one species. For more information about
each anuran family, see the
Anuran Families and
the Taxonomic Model section.
Current anuran taxonomy is rather chaotic at times. There are
often disagreements as to the legitimacy of certain taxon, from
subspecies level all the way up to the families. In addition, new
species are discovered quite frequently in the wild, at least
compared to many other animal orders. Our abilities to analyze
species at the molecular level are becoming sharper as time goes on,
which often results in the re-classification of existing
species.
Photo Credits:
Dendrobates pumilio "bastimentos", copyright Arachnokulture,
http://www.pumilio.com
Bombina variegata tadpole, copyright Paolo Mazzei,
Amphibians
& Reptiles of Europe
References
AmphibiaWeb (2003).
http://amphibiaweb.org/.
(Accessed: 2001-2003).
Bruce, Richard, Robert G. Jaeger, and Lynne D. Houck. The Biology of
Plethodontid Salamanders. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
Cloudsley-Thompson, J.L. The Diversity of Amphibians & Reptiles: An
Introduction. Springer Verlag, 1999.
Duellman, William, and Linda Trueb. Biology of Amphibians. Johns
Hopkins University Pr., 1994.
Ford, L.S., and D.C. Cannatella. 1993. The major clades of frogs. Herpetological
Monographs 7: 94-117.
Green, David M, Stanley K. Sessions. Amphibian Cytogenetics and
Evolution. Academic Press, 1997.
Griffiths, Richard A. Newts and Salamanders of Europe. San Diego,
CA: Academic Press Inc., 1996.
Larson, Allan. (1996). Caudata. Tree of Life Web Project.
http://tolweb.org/tree?group=Caudata&contgroup=Living_Amphibians.
(Accessed: 2003). Milner, A.R. 1988. The relationships and origins of
living amphibians. Pp. 59-102 In M. J. Benton (Ed.), The Phylogeny
and Classification of the Tetrapods. 1. Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds.
Oxford University Press, Oxford.
|